http://calcg.org/newlogo2.png Not Logged in.
Login | Register

General Discussion Board \ Calculator Discussion \ Which is better HW1 or HW2

Click here to log in (you must be logged in to post comments).

AuthorComment
Digital
Guardian
avatar
Posted: 25 Nov 2002
07:48 GMT
Total Posts: 1051
Most ppl today have HW2 calcs but a few of us still have the HW1 calcs that came out in the dinosaur age. They each have there pros and cons. Which is better when everything is considered?
zkostik
Carrier
avatar
Posted: 25 Nov 2002
15:00 GMT
Total Posts: 2486
Hard to say. Either one has something of their own. Since most people make programs for HW2, you can probably forget about 7 layer grayscale. That was like the only good thing about HW1.

---
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
Billy
Ultralisk
Posted: 25 Nov 2002
21:40 GMT
Total Posts: 260
I bought a TI-89 this year from Staples and got a HW1. That shows how many of those they sell...
Anyways, as for which is better, HW2 is slightly faster. And has a lovely crystal in the hardware. Plus, you don't need to use maxmem on it, like you do on HW1, to get full use out of the memory.
However, like zkostik said, HW1 has the lovely 7 layer greyscale abilities.
Digital
Guardian
avatar
Posted: 26 Nov 2002
07:54 GMT
Total Posts: 1051
Thats supprising, I thought HW1 were not being produced anymore. One of my freinds got and 89 that was HW2 just a week ago. Only three out of about 10 ppl at my school have HW1. Do you guys think that TI purposly made it impossible for HW2 to do 7 layer gray (actually it is 8 if you count white). I like HW2 but for a lot of progs you have to have hw2patch installed on your calc last time I checked. So I have to say that even though maxmem and hw2patch do different things they kind of cancel each other out. Do you guys know the speed of the 92(+) proc and the Voyage 200 proc?
slubman
Probe
Posted: 8 Dec 2002
11:45 GMT
Total Posts: 1
Now you can use h220xtsr instead of hw2patch!!!
zkostik
Carrier
avatar
Posted: 8 Dec 2002
18:25 GMT
Total Posts: 2486
Yeah, that's like if you're using AMS 2.08 I think coz hw2patch was only updated up to AMS 2.05.

---
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
Digital
Guardian
avatar
Posted: 9 Dec 2002
07:21 GMT
Total Posts: 1051
Ya but some progs still require hw2patch and clain h220xtsr.
zkostik
Carrier
avatar
Posted: 9 Dec 2002
20:52 GMT
Total Posts: 2486
Yup, oh how I noticed that!!! Thanks for pointing out.

---
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
Digital
Guardian
avatar
Posted: 11 Dec 2002
07:39 GMT
Total Posts: 1051
This is ot but sadly to say Tankers has gone down to my thrid most favorite game. First off I have no one else to plan, then I haven't added my new maps yet, and Mercury is cool, and finally CF rocks. I only get some memory volation errors. Sorry guys but the circumstances have changed.
zkostik
Carrier
avatar
Posted: 11 Dec 2002
15:47 GMT
Total Posts: 2486
It's true that lack of updates due to many issue bring the project down. If SP mode was finally finished results would have been better. I myself almost don't have any free time right now and haven't touched my calc for some time.

---
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0





Portal | My Account | Register | Lost Password or Username | TOS | Disclaimer | Help | Site Search | File Archives Copyright © 2002-2019 CalcG.org